Jump to content
/\quarius

is Madonna TRULY the queen of pop?

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, ZAYN MALIK said:

Sorry but never moo3 

 

Pon De Replay

SOS

Unfaithful

Umbrella

Don't Stop the Music 

Shut Up and Drive

Disturbia

Take a Bow

Russian Roulette

Rude Boy

Only Girl

What's My Name

S&M

Love the Way You Lie Part 2

We Found Love

Where Have You Been

Diamonds

Stay

Work

Needed Me

Love on the Brain

+ Who's That Chick

+ Take Care

+ The Monster

+ This Is What You Came For

+ Wild Thoughts

rih5 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Ursula said:

Pon De Replay

SOS

Unfaithful

Umbrella

Don't Stop the Music 

Shut Up and Drive

Disturbia

Take a Bow

Russian Roulette

Rude Boy

Only Girl

What's My Name

S&M

Love the Way You Lie Part 2

We Found Love

Where Have You Been

Diamonds

Stay

Work

Needed Me

Love on the Brain

+ Who's That Chick

+ Take Care

+ The Monster

+ This Is What You Came For

+ Wild Thoughts

rih5 

 

2 minutes ago, Urbanov said:

I mean you could make an entire album based on her #1 hits. When will Zayn tbh

Makes no sense. Bunch of hits don't make you the new Madonna. Rihanna's music has never and most likely will never be on the level of Madonna's. She hasnt reached 1% of M's art in her music. Madonna is talented in many areas, she writes her music, contributes in the production, always comes up with a new theme and is a performance artist. What is really Rihanna? She releases quick singles, which probably become hits, but they have no..... substance? While Madonna does all those things with her music, Rihanna just... sings? Kudos to the few songs she ever wrote. Madonna also changed her sound with all of her albums ever since LAP, while Rihanna has always been following the current trend, except 50% of ANTi. 

So, no, Rihanna is far from being the New or Black or whatever Madonna.

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said:

 

Makes no sense. Bunch of hits don't make you the new Madonna. Rihanna's music has never and most likely will never be on the level of Madonna's. She hasnt reached 1% of M's art in her music. Madonna is talented in many areas, she writes her music, contributes in the production, always comes up with a new theme and is a performance artist. What is really Rihanna? She releases quick singles, which probably become hits, but they have no..... substance? While Madonna does all those things with her music, Rihanna just... sings? Kudos to the few songs she ever wrote. Madonna also changed her sound with all of her albums ever since LAP, while Rihanna has always been following the current trend, except 50% of ANTi. 

So, no, Rihanna is far from being the New or Black or whatever Madonna.

I love rih but this is the only truth clap1

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said:

She releases quick singles, which probably become hits, but they have no..... substance?

So why you can still listen to her older hits on the radio? Not to mention that Rihanna has way more radio spins than Gaga, so it's kinda funny you said that.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Urbanov said:

So why you can still listen to her older hits on the radio? Not to mention that Rihanna has way more radio spins than Gaga, so it's kinda funny you said that.

Idk why they have more spins wat3

What I said is they have no substance. They follow the current trend and are easy-to-swallow, made for the public to eat them up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said:

Idk why they have more spins wat3

What I said is they have no substance. They follow the current trend and are easy-to-swallow, made for the public to eat them up. 

And I'm asking if they have no substance and follow current trends like you claim then why you can still listen to them on the radio?

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Urbanov said:

And I'm asking if they have no substance and follow current trends like you claim then why you can still listen to them on the radio?

Because they were hits when they were released because they followed the current trend.

Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said:

Because they were hits when they were released because they followed the current trend.

I think you don't get my point jj3 If her older songs are being played on the radio then they need to have some kind of substance. Also a lot of radio stations plays some older/classic/timeless songs and Rihanna gets some spins there too, so maybe not everything she drops is following the current trends like you speak? jj3

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Urbanov said:

I think you don't get my point jj3 If her older songs are being played on the radio then they need to have some kind of substance. Also a lot of radio stations plays some older/classic/timeless songs and Rihanna gets some spins there too, so maybe not everything she drops is following the current trends like you speak? jj3

jj3

She still is far from Madonna's art jj3

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, Freaky Prince said:

jj3

She still is far from Madonna's art jj3

Well, that's true and I won't argue with that. Rihanna is basically a singer and performer. She barely writes her own shit, she's not a producer, she doesn't play on any instruments but for me ANTI is a great preview of what she's going to do next (dropping few smash hits and making a good quality album at the same time) and I like this direction.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, light741 said:

@/\quarius

 

 

Madonna is the queen of pop because she has the most distinctive discography among female pop singers IMO. Janet, Mariah, Whitney may have done pop records here and there but overall their music took a different path compared to pop stars. Also Madonna redefined the meaning of a pop star. She was sexy, challenging, visual, bitchy, soft. She was a new package of pop for women.  As for M stans. Some of them aren't truly aware of Madonna's legacy as a whole, if they were, they wouldn't feel the need to drag other female legends. And some are just insecure and filled with hypocrisy, ironic since their fave is Madonna. 

 

No denying this at all. Madonna is the Queen. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Freaky Prince said:

 

Makes no sense. Bunch of hits don't make you the new Madonna. Rihanna's music has never and most likely will never be on the level of Madonna's. She hasnt reached 1% of M's art in her music. Madonna is talented in many areas, she writes her music, contributes in the production, always comes up with a new theme and is a performance artist. What is really Rihanna? She releases quick singles, which probably become hits, but they have no..... substance? While Madonna does all those things with her music, Rihanna just... sings? Kudos to the few songs she ever wrote. Madonna also changed her sound with all of her albums ever since LAP, while Rihanna has always been following the current trend, except 50% of ANTi. 

So, no, Rihanna is far from being the New or Black or whatever Madonna.

Rihanna is queen of fashion, foreheads, Twitter drags, being quite a down-to-Earth popstar, she has a distinctive voice, she's experimented with different styles (pop/rock/rocksteady/dance/R&B etc.) so although she doesn't write her own songs and isn't as creatively involved, I feel like the next generation of singers will be name-checking her as inspiration hottie1 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I think that just because the stans is constantly reminding people that she's the queen, doesn't discredit her for her undeniable legacy. I mean, proving their faves is the best is what all stans do, isn't it? FHac3Np.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Freaky Prince said:

 

Makes no sense. Bunch of hits don't make you the new Madonna. Rihanna's music has never and most likely will never be on the level of Madonna's. She hasnt reached 1% of M's art in her music. Madonna is talented in many areas, she writes her music, contributes in the production, always comes up with a new theme and is a performance artist. What is really Rihanna? She releases quick singles, which probably become hits, but they have no..... substance? While Madonna does all those things with her music, Rihanna just... sings? Kudos to the few songs she ever wrote. Madonna also changed her sound with all of her albums ever since LAP, while Rihanna has always been following the current trend, except 50% of ANTi. 

So, no, Rihanna is far from being the New or Black or whatever Madonna.

This. There are too many female artists being labeled as the new queen or princess, yet their music has no substance.

 

Honestly, people should stop treating some artists like "the new version" or "the black version" of older artists. Why can't Rihanna be Rihanna? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 324
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

@/\quarius     Madonna is the queen of pop because she has the most distinctive discography among female pop singers IMO. Janet, Mariah, Whitney may have done pop records here and there

Yes she is. However, the reason Madonna fans are so insecure is because has constantly been put in jeopardy; by the press, other fan bases, etc. While she is the biggest selling and most suc

This thread is ridiculous. Madonna is universally known as the Queen of Pop. Media has called Bruno, JT, Bieber, Usher, etc. kings of pop at some point in their careers, does that mean that MJ is not


  • Browsing now   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×