J.Lo or Britney

[Phoebe 7,055]

You are given the chance to go to one concert and the choices are J.Lo and Britney Spears. Which one of them would you pick?

For me definitely, 100% Jennifer.  

[Sylk 143,205]

I would not pass up on diamond selling global living legend, so we're gonna go see Britney! 

[Jjang 15,807]

Well I’ve seen Britney and she sucked so the other one

[Phoebe 7,055]

Just now, Jjang said:

Well I’ve seen Britney and she sucked

Where?

[Freaky Prince 37,250]

Jennifer.

[Jjang 15,807]

Just now, Rachel Green said:

Where?

Tel Aviv. The concert all Britney fans brag about lol, everyone hated it. 

[Urbi 51,338]

12 minutes ago, Sylk said:

diamond selling global living legend

shame this doesn't translate to quality of her shows

 

OT: J Lo obvi

[Kenya 2,696]

Why isn’t there a poll

[plutoniano 14,895]

as much as I think JLos show would be objectively better and more worth it. The 10 year old britard that lives in me would still go to see Botney even if this is what I get

Spoiler

 

[Jose 3,468]

britney  

[Michael. 41,092]

Britney even if JLo is a better performer currently lol

 

She has the better, more iconic catalogue and I'll be seeing a much bigger star. 

32 minutes ago, Jjang said:

Tel Aviv. The concert all Britney fans brag about lol, everyone hated it. 

They brag about it because of its attendance, not the show itself.  

[Urbi 51,338]

1 minute ago, Michael. said:

She has the better, more iconic catalogue and I'll be seeing a much bigger star.  

So you'd see her regardless of having a good time? lol

[Michael. 41,092]

3 minutes ago, Urbanov said:

So you'd see her regardless of having a good time? lol

Tinashe is a great performer and a better one than Britney, most people would still go see Britney. Your point? 

And who said I couldn't have a good time lol.

[Vesper 5,343]

Britney obviously. 

 

As much as I like JLo, britney just has better songs

[Urbi 51,338]

14 minutes ago, Michael. said:

Tinashe is a great performer and a better one than Britney, most people would still go see Britney. Your point? 

My point is that considering J.Lo is a better performer currently (you said so, too) you'd have more fun at her show than Britney's. It's like you're at festival and two of your favourite acts are on two different stages at the same time - obviously you'll go where you'd have more fun cause other show is gonna be a waste of it...

 

 

...unless you don't consider listening to the tape recording and watching Stiffney on stage for 1 hour a waste of time

[Michael. 41,092]

Just now, Urbanov said:

My point is that considering J.Lo is a better performer currently (you said so, too) you'd have more fun at her show than Britney's. It's like you're at festival and two of your favourite acts are on two different stages at the same time - obviously you'll go where you'd have more fun cause other show is gonna be a waste of it...

 

 

...unless you don't consider listening to the tape recording and watching Stiffney on stage for 1 hour a waste of time

If it was necessarily about the better performer then Janet Jackson, Tinashe etc. would all be doing better than Britney in the tours department.  

It's not the ultimate factor when people want to go see a show, the more you know.  And no, I didn't say I'd have more fun at JLo's show, thank you for putting words in my mouth, I said she was the better performer. I'd probably have more fun at Britney's show considering I'm more familiar and I like Britney and her music more.  

[Urbi 51,338]

3 minutes ago, Michael. said:

If it was necessarily about the better performer then Janet Jackson, Tinashe etc. would all be doing better than Britney in the tours department.  

Therefore J Lo > Britney

3 minutes ago, Michael. said:

It's not the ultimate factor when people want to go see a show, the more you know.

If you feel like wasting your time on something you know it's worse

4 minutes ago, Michael. said:

And no, I didn't say I'd have more fun at JLo's show, thank you for putting words in my mouth, I said she was the better performer.

 

9 minutes ago, Urbanov said:

My point is that considering J.Lo is a better performer currently (you said so, too)

reading sweetie

[Michael. 41,092]

Just now, Urbanov said:

Therefore J Lo > Britney

If you feel like wasting your time on something you know it's worse

 

reading sweetie

Reading? The audacity.  

10 minutes ago, Urbanov said:

considering J.Lo is a better performer currently (you said so, too) you'd have more fun at her show than Britney's

 

I claimed she was the better performer, yes but I never said I'd have more fun at her show, that's your interpretation of it. Next. 

But keep forcing your opinion on others though, it's cute.  

[Urbi 51,338]

4 minutes ago, Michael. said:

I claimed she was the better performer, yes but I never said I'd have more fun at her show, that's your interpretation of it. Next. 

But keep forcing your opinion on others though, it's cute.  

I know it's sunday but you might need an extra coffee or something

You asked what's my point. Well, I said that MY POINT is considering that she's a "better performer" and even you said that yourself - quote

44 minutes ago, Michael. said:

even if JLo is a better performer currently lol

then you'd have more fun at her show? I never suggested that you said that. That's my point and you came back with "thank you for putting words in my mouth" lmao

[Brightflower 19,288]

This is hard, as i dont really think much of either artist. JLo is currently and for that last 10 years or so has been the better performer, but Britney has a slightly better catalog that im more familiar with.