Jump to content

Archived

This thread has been closed to further replies because it was not updated for 12 months. If you wish to have this thread reinstated, please contact an administrator.

Bionic Monster

Madonna attempts to shade probable "Best Actress" nominee Lady Gaga

Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Earth Ripper said:

So does Do What U Want at SNL then brit9 And like every movie ever made.

And I said it doesn't? I said Madonna's book has pornographic content and her fans just can't seem to handle it bey8

Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, HninSi said:

And I said it doesn't? I said Madonna's book has pornographic content and her fans just can't seem to handle it bey8

No. You called it a porn book and said it didn't matter that academics thought it was actually an art book rav1 Not taking this bait.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Earth Ripper said:

No. You called it a porn book and said it didn't matter that academics thought it was actually an art book rav1 Not taking this bait.

Yes. Some thought it's art.

Some thought it's porn.

I said it has porn content, a fact.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
58 minutes ago, HninSi said:

Yes. Some thought it's art.

Some thought it's porn.

I said it has porn content, a fact.

You said it was a porn book. Don't act like that's the same as saying there's pornographic content in there (which I also don't agree with` btw: artistic photography, erotic or not, is not pornography, which serves the sole purpose of helping people, men specifically, to jack off: that was obviously ot Madonna's intention, nor was it Kate Winslet's intention when she banged a teenager in The Reader, lol) oprah9

Link to post
Share on other sites
20 minutes ago, Earth Ripper said:

You said it was a porn book. Don't act like that's the same as saying there's pornographic content in there (which I also don't agree with` btw: artistic photography, erotic or not, is not pornography, which serves the sole purpose of helping people, men specifically, to jack off: that was obviously ot Madonna's intention, nor was it Kate Winslet's intention when she banged a teenager in The Reader, lol) oprah9

When I said it is a porn book, you can take it as my opinion.

It has pornographic content well throughout . That's not debatable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, HninSi said:

When I said it is a porn book, you can take it as my opinion.

Then why do you have such an issue with fans (and non-fans) having a different opinion? brit4 The backtrack is real.

10 minutes ago, HninSi said:

It has pornographic content well throughout . That's not debatable. 

It is to me, actually. It's definitely erotic but it seems to me more artistic, coffee table style "look at that, omg" photography than something you'd actually beat off to oprah11 I'm sure people have beaten off on it, but people also jerk off to Hermione in Harry Potter um2

The unspoken rule of film and photography is that it's not porn as long as you don't see any erected penis, I stick by that rule personally xtina11

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 332
  • Created
  • Last Reply

  • Browsing now   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×