Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Madonna attempts to shade probable "Best Actress" nominee Lady Gaga

Recommended Posts

HninSi    349
53 minutes ago, Earth Ripper said:

So does Do What U Want at SNL then brit9 And like every movie ever made.

And I said it doesn't? I said Madonna's book has pornographic content and her fans just can't seem to handle it bey8

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Nocturn    6,112
15 minutes ago, HninSi said:

And I said it doesn't? I said Madonna's book has pornographic content and her fans just can't seem to handle it bey8

But it isn't porn exactly. 

It is erotic photography.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Earth Ripper    4,315
4 hours ago, HninSi said:

And I said it doesn't? I said Madonna's book has pornographic content and her fans just can't seem to handle it bey8

No. You called it a porn book and said it didn't matter that academics thought it was actually an art book rav1 Not taking this bait.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HninSi    349
8 hours ago, Earth Ripper said:

No. You called it a porn book and said it didn't matter that academics thought it was actually an art book rav1 Not taking this bait.

Yes. Some thought it's art.

Some thought it's porn.

I said it has porn content, a fact.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Earth Ripper    4,315
58 minutes ago, HninSi said:

Yes. Some thought it's art.

Some thought it's porn.

I said it has porn content, a fact.

You said it was a porn book. Don't act like that's the same as saying there's pornographic content in there (which I also don't agree with` btw: artistic photography, erotic or not, is not pornography, which serves the sole purpose of helping people, men specifically, to jack off: that was obviously ot Madonna's intention, nor was it Kate Winslet's intention when she banged a teenager in The Reader, lol) oprah9

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
HninSi    349
20 minutes ago, Earth Ripper said:

You said it was a porn book. Don't act like that's the same as saying there's pornographic content in there (which I also don't agree with` btw: artistic photography, erotic or not, is not pornography, which serves the sole purpose of helping people, men specifically, to jack off: that was obviously ot Madonna's intention, nor was it Kate Winslet's intention when she banged a teenager in The Reader, lol) oprah9

When I said it is a porn book, you can take it as my opinion.

It has pornographic content well throughout . That's not debatable. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Earth Ripper    4,315
9 minutes ago, HninSi said:

When I said it is a porn book, you can take it as my opinion.

Then why do you have such an issue with fans (and non-fans) having a different opinion? brit4 The backtrack is real.

10 minutes ago, HninSi said:

It has pornographic content well throughout . That's not debatable. 

It is to me, actually. It's definitely erotic but it seems to me more artistic, coffee table style "look at that, omg" photography than something you'd actually beat off to oprah11 I'm sure people have beaten off on it, but people also jerk off to Hermione in Harry Potter um2

The unspoken rule of film and photography is that it's not porn as long as you don't see any erected penis, I stick by that rule personally xtina11

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Sign in to follow this  

  • Browsing now   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×