Jump to content

Archived

This thread has been closed to further replies because it was not updated for 12 months. If you wish to have this thread reinstated, please contact an administrator.

Kristina

Britney: "I watched a little bit of the last documentary and a lot of what you heard is not true"

Recommended Posts

CNN Documentary was genuinely shit. It was done in poor taste with all the chat around KFed and Justin. It focused 90% on the past before giving us 10mins on the current scenario (which is what matters). I'd be pissed too.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently the CNN one used some triggering footage (from 2007 probably) and said she checked herself into the mental health facility when she herself said she was forced to, so it makes sense if she’s talking about that + its the newest one

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Kyoteki said:

All the documentaries are literally exploiting. Which yeah it adds light ti the situation, but without Britney’s permission. Is that even better?

This... the only reason they exist is so TV companies can make money off someone's ongoing personal situation. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't think it's the FX/NYT docs ("Framing" & "Controlling") since Rosengart has been pushing it over the surveillance allegations, and the Netflix doc isn't out yet. Besides, she specifically said "the last one", and the last one to come out is the CNN documentary, so it has to be it.

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Kyoteki said:

All the documentaries are literally exploiting. Which yeah it adds light ti the situation, but without Britney’s permission. Is that even better?

Britney has the rights of a child in front on the court. She cannnot even give permission, sign a contract or meet with the producers of the docs without her father intercepting it and giving HIS approval for her. That would mean a conflict of interest. 

Even if she wanted to give permission she can't. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Atlantis Princess said:

Britney has the rights of a child in front on the court. She cannnot even give permission, sign a contract or meet with the producers of the docs without her father intercepting it and giving HIS approval for her. That would mean a conflict of interest. 

Even if she wanted to give permission she can't. 

So why make documentaries where the information is wrong and Britney gets no say or anything about it? Its weird

Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Kyoteki said:

So why make documentaries where the information is wrong and Britney gets no say or anything about it? Its weird

To explain the situation she's in. Some people didn't even know what's a conservatorship until this year. 

Most of them Hulu/Netflix are done with care, sources and professional journalists there's really nothing wrong with them. It's only the ones that are made for quick cash like CNN and 60 Minutes Australia that sensationalize everything that are trash and get info wrong.

I still believe that without the first one Framing Britney and the media frenzy it caused, the court case wouldn't have progressed so much to the point her father has filed for termination. But at this point yes they're becoming saturated. I hope there are no more until Britney decides to tell her story herself. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 18
  • Created
  • Last Reply

  • Browsing now   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

×